CONCLUSION? not much besides: ♪♫ I (26M) MARRIED THE BOSS'S DAUGHTER (16F)! ♪♫ a 1983 marriage & a 1938 movie with his TESTIMONY ♪♫ (click to donate) |
Notional WALL-O'-TEXT:
(i'll add to it 'til i have nothing more to say)
♪♫
Coattails are like cocktails-on-vacation, they're included in the package & cocktails-on-vacation are like sneakin' pizza on a diet & sneakin' pizza on a diet's like building a mansion up the road & building a mansion up the road's like sneakin' cocktails-on-vacation. Maybe g&t or neat & cigarettes for whisky. But, Davis' coattails have markedly frayed since 2014. Mike's laurels have been high mileage for decades. Like any tippler's. It must be hard being Davis' lapdog, respected by him, with so many jobs, while imagining he deserves more head-pats. So he has different, not-hormonal, frustrated desires post-1983? Interesting. He craves head pats & respect. Is this a side effect of sympathy sucking, or it's own separate thing? No matter. At least Mike has a struggle of a sort. Pride caused all this. Tanya & Mike just imagine he's amazing. His tv viewers know he's not. So, at least word's getting out again & he's spreading it this time, instead of FACTNet. He may be getting another award. This time a sash. He's going to look like an African dictator for his tv show soon. Evangelist Emeritus' Sash-of-Significance, about 40 years overdue & his last go-getter ministry. Although, he didn't have to dig anything out, just read a map & drive. Unfortunately it won't be awarded postmortem. But fingers crossed, things are tense in Graham. Mike sneaked his fingers into the cookie jar, so that's the bed he lies on. Folk's don't respect him, not just for marrying Tanya, this's just one reason & not even the main one anymore. Have you seen the short of the chimp who wouldn't get his hand out of the jar (Graham) because he wouldn't let go of the little-goody (possessions)? What did he think would happen? Mike's preaching is like a chimp slinging poo & a chimp slinging poo [is]... Sorry, should this be, [is] normal chimp behavior or [is] like Mike's preaching; I like the first one, both are correct. 2+2=4 4=2+2. Forbidden fruit isn't sweet, just forbidden. The Bible teaches sin's bitter. Pride teaches sin's sweet. Pride requires head pats & respect. Mike only imagines his sin tastes sweet. Like with Tanya, maybe he doesn't sugar his coffee 'cause he imagines it sweet. So why not imagine disrespect is respect? Or, childless is with-child? Or a double-wide is a mansion? Or tele-whining is tele-preaching? They imagine stay-getting is go-getting, so they've done it before. Mike's had 11-years to prove everyone wrong & now he's broadcasting in the interim & demanding head-pats on tv? RESPECT ME! - this's what Kekel's ministry is. RESPECT ME! - this's what Denis' ministry is. I hope to never experience again someone as vicious from the pulpit as Oloans - this's what Kinson's ministry will be. If it don't work, do it again. Pride makes folks act the same every time it's tried. Pride requires head pats. Ashmore, Infausto, Gesang, me, Gaylord (RIP), makes no difference who we were. Makes no difference who gave 4-digits, or where they stuck them. Only right-now counts right-now. God don't credit laurels, God only credits Christ to credit. God looks for a right-now Christ, not works. Works are dead-in-Christ. Yet, Mike sallies forth & grinds personal axes to tilt at imaginary giants. Everyone's a giant to a small person, so he demands RESPECT ME! with sparks flying. I'm sure Kekel is taller than me by inches, but he seems smaller. Maybe 'cause I only see him on tv. Or maybe this's just my go-getter-perception of the stay-getter. He's on tv with sparks flying. He preaches & teaches with sparks flying. He'll-fix-us-just-you-wait-&-see with sparks flying. He hates quitters, with sparks flying. He never started, with sparks flying. Evangelist emeritus. Not fire, not flame, not wind; sparks. Not water; sparks. No whirlwind; sparks. No faith, hope, charity; sparks. I lived in Sparks for maybe 3-weeks, during my freewheelin', 1970s, cross-country, hitchhiking, adventures. Sometimes parties took a while back then. The_WHIRLWIND's (in self-styled name only) at his best when sparks be flying. Yet, a spark can't light the path. A spark's pointless without oil. A spark promises, not delivers. A spark's potential, not realization. A spark's just grit & heat e.g. Mike's tele-pastorate. I'm Senior STAY-GETTER! I'm Senior PEW-SITTER! I'm RESPECTED! I MARRIED THE BOSS'S DAUGHTER! See Mike getting gritty on tv, feel his heat. RESPECT his bleat & he toots a horn? Was sister Olson disgusted by Mike? Is Verna? Is Rodger? Mom & Pop were. I wasn't before 2025, Deborah was, but she was in-the-know. I never much considered his children-preferred-bent since it was a don't-go-there topic while in. So I never heard about it since we didn't talk bad of the leadership at home. We quit the cult in 2008. From 2010 to 2012 we blogged, talking bad of the leadership & about other cult stuff. I finished my military 24+ in 2021 & social-security in 2023. I don't think I knew about Mike's age-inappropriate conjugating verve until FACTNet & by then I'd been around 13 years by ignoring red-flags. Hi, I'm Super-Senior LLC-tele-Pastor Mike Kekel & Pastor Davis respects me & I married the bosses daughter. Click-to-donate since I'm about to retire. Tootles chumps. Really? Why wait? Run along to AZ now. Graham'll be glad you did until shortly after Kinson's installed. Then it's Oloans 2.0 & we'll wish Mike was back. Like many wanted Davis back after some got a tasted of Mike. He bucked pastor Davis' policies & still chases the world, what can he offer? Senior stay-getter? Senior pew-sitter? Respected? What does he offer? He's Tanya's husband? Great, he's still unfit for command. Quit means quit & not conduct? Mike's hermeneutics & homiletics are horrendous. Davis'/our rules were Mike's policy? Rules isn't a synonym of policy, but policy is a synonym of rules. Like moral isn't a synonym of ethical, but ethical is a synonym of moral. Another way to understand this is morals are never unethical, but ethics can be immoral; again, morals judge ethics, never the obverse. A rule is never policy, but policy is always a rule. Organization's have unique ethics that are sometimes morally wrong. See how this works? Anyway, so, I'm not sure what his point of qualifying the difference between rule & policy is is? Does he ever even know? Or was he using the main cult tactic of changing language meaning? Is it intentional or incidental? Inquiring minds would like to know; always more questions when they do explain.
No comments:
Post a Comment